An
Interview with
Terri Moore
Atheist
and secular Pagan
Q.
Who is Terri Moore?
That’s
a really good question, you know - one I’m
not sure I know the answer to. I can tell you who
she was, or has been, though. Born 8th November
1959 at 5:00 am, oldest child of two scientists,
granddaughter of Scottish and German Peerage, I
was originally Terri Jay Anderson, of Clans Anderson
and McKay, von Banning and the Welsh Georges. I
have been a daughter, sister, and mother in my time.
I am none of these now.
I
have studied Astronomy and Physics at university,
but utilize very little science today. I have been
a servant of drugs and alcohol, and a victim of
paralyzing agoraphobia and inexplicably lost both
addictions and the phobia a few years ago. I have
stood on the precipice of death, shuffled a toe
over, and returned again to life. I have been a
humble Christian and a Wiccan High Priestess, and
now am neither.
Five
years ago I lost everything I had, including my
family, and have started again from nothing. At
the moment I live in Bloubosrand in Randburg, with
my Life Partner Warren and a Pit Bull called Charybdys.
I work as an IT professional, and otherwise conduct
myself pretty much as a hermit. I socialize very,
very rarely and enjoy my own company. When I do
venture out, it’s pretty likely to be to a
Meet Up of Atheists whose honesty and integrity
I prize very highly indeed, to say nothing of their
intelligent sense of humour. I am honoured to count
myself one of their number.
I
get a strong sense of myself as an entity in constant
change, the almost permanent feeling of being born
anew each day, of someone who is becoming something,
which just eludes her vision. So, really, while
I know where I come from, it is not yet apparent
what I truly am or what I may become.
Q.
How did you come to embracing Paganism?
I
was subverted into Paganism in 1985. I’d had
a couple of flings with Christianity before that,
as I seem to have been an inherently ‘religious’
person.
My
first introduction into the Pagan lifestyle was
person-on-person, which I think many people are
missing today. These days we’re far more likely
to find our answers through the Internet, or if
we’re lucky and literate, through books. It’s
not the same really.
I
split my learning between England and South Africa
though, which has made for a mind well divided between
the hemispheres. I grew up in England, and the very
words ‘June’ and ‘July’
have a deep ring of summer to me, even today!
Q.
How would you define a Pagan?
I’ve
come to believe that a Pagan is pretty much self-defined
today. The roots of the word, as we know, refer
to someone ‘of the land’. Hence to me
a Pagan can be a wide variety of people - a hard
polytheist, a crypto-monotheist or even an atheist.
The key is the personal bond to the Earth. She really
is our Mother, and every living thing is our brethren.
I
have a very lively appreciation of the fact that
we are all stardust, literally. I’m still
continually overawed by the majesty and beauty of
the universe.
So
I’m not too keen on a narrow definition of
the term. However, there are, to my mind, one or
two precluding characteristics. I don’t believe
that anyone who identifies the Earth as enemy territory
to be conquered and destroyed as we reach for some
ancient ‘goat-herders’ definition of
paradise should be considered a Pagan.
Q.
Tell us about your experience of the Gardnerian
Tradition. Are you still a practicing Gardnerian?
Who initiated you?
Here’s
a thing: although I have extensively rewritten both
Sabbat and Esbat liturgical material to fit in better
with my non-theist stance, I find myself often reverting
to doing it the way that I was taught. There are
some works which carry such a sense of grandeur
that they just feel right for the occasion. The
Gardnerian BOS is one of those works. So yes, I
still practice in the way of a Gardnerian, but I
do not count myself one any longer. I took my First
and Third Initiations from Clwyd in Forest Town
(East End of London) in 1986 and 1989 respectively,
and I have worked with a Dianic Coven. However much
I slag off the Gardnerians (and indeed they are
often so full of Old Bollocks), I regard them to
be serious about their religion. They have a good
deal of integrity (as well as a good deal of secrecy),
and I do respect them greatly for that. My gratitude
also goes out to them for finding me in the first
place worthy to instruct.
Q.
Was Gerald Gardner really a horny old sod, or are
the rumours just that?
Hah!
No public stance on this one, I’m afraid.
But if you are well acquainted with the old British
Colonial upbringing and hence psyche, you can certainly
draw your own conclusions!
Q.
Does neo-Paganism have a place for reverends, clergy,
congregations and churches?
Most
unfortunately yes. There seems to definitely be
a place for the above-mentioned scroungers, spongers
and hangers-on. The delightful terms from the world
of Other Anthropoids describe most of them well:
“Fake Silverbacks” and “Pseudo
Alphas”.
Seen
this way, their comical aspirations to be the deliverer
of their people from Evil make sense at last. Allowing
Fake Silverbacks into our ranks may have been one
of the most deadly mistakes we have ever made, as
a race.
This
is not to say that I don’t have a deal of
respect for some people who just happen to also
have a clerical title before their names - the Rev.’s
Arias Ndlovu and Epona Moondancer come to mind as
decent folk who are working within a largely rotten
paradigm.
Q.
Can neo-Pagans justify exclusionism by distancing
themselves from traditional African spirituality?
Seems
to me that South Africans are getting pretty GOOD
at justifying their exclusionism. Seems to ME that
there’s a major fear for some of them that
someone who comes from a direct unbroken line of
shamans and spiritual healers might just show them
up for the patzers they are.
I
may have no wish to become a sangoma myself, but
some of our European neo-Pagans are rather over-stressing
their distinction from traditional African healers.
Makes very little sense to me, unless of course
we are looking at an insidious refinement of white
supremacy here.
Q.
How do you feel about the commercialization of religion
in general and Witchcraft specifically?
I
take a pretty dim view of both religion and advertising,
so the combination is bound to give me indigestion.
The abundant smearing around of platitudes meant
to comfort or inspire is likely to turn my stomach.
Deepak Chopra gives me the absolute pip - yes I
have read him, and heartily wish I hadn’t.
That’s some scary stuff.
Let’s
be real here, I consider religion to be a peculiarly
human vice, one that is akin to mental illness,
and it can be both as harmful and as hard to be
rid of. I think we have no business popularizing
schizophrenia, for instance, or touting OC disease
as an answer to our lives. Just so, religion should
never be packaged as a consumer item.
Witchcraft,
even when not ‘sold’ as a religion,
seems to fall prey to ethically deficient morons
with about as much regularity as does Pentecostal
Christianity. The emphasis seems to be on how much
revenge you can extract from your enemies, or how
much power you can learn to wield over those ‘not
in the know’. It’s all about a feeling
of personal powerlessness, in other words. Some
people will go to great lengths, pay any price,
to feel empowered.
Q.
What do you think are the qualities required of
an elder in any spiritual or religious community?
An
‘elder’ should require their chelas
to think it through for themselves, always. And
be ever willing to engage in an exchange of ideas.
With anybody. No more than that. Oh, OK- being grounded
in something approximating reality helps as well.
That, and a keen sense of their own lack of omnipotence.
Q.
What do you think of European Paganism and Pagans
in South Africa to date?
I
think we’ve got off to a bit of a shaky start.
To date, we still have too many people out there
striving to feed their own deep powerlessness with
the light of publicity. It doesn’t need to
be that way but we must also look at our society
overall in this country. Image seems to be everything.
The appearance of wealth is just about the most
important thing there is to most South Africans
and the blasé acceptance of the most grinding
poverty existing side by side with the most extreme
affluence. How can we expect the Pagans who arise
out of this society to be well balanced? I believe
that we will get there however, just as I believe
this wonderful country will eventually be the best
little corner of the earth to live in!
Q. What is your definition of magick? Is it just
superstition?
I
like the definition: “The true magic is that
which cannot be named”, but of course that’s
just dodging the question. I certainly don’t
believe that I, or anyone else, can achieve macroscopic
changes in reality in a short period of time. One
doesn’t alter the laws of physics just by
thinking really hard at them.
What
you can change is the way you think and hence how
you act and react in this universe. Many micro changes
like this and you may see something worth noting.
I’m
very well aware that I don’t know how everything
or even most things work. There are almost certainly
nuances to this world that I have failed entirely
to notice. But I do believe that we will, one day,
know much more. However, this will only come to
pass if we continue to apply ourselves to the scientific
disciplines, Meditating upon the shape of the universe
may feel damn good, but it won’t add a jot
or a tittle to our understanding of it unless we
get off our bums and try to make those measurements
in real time.
What if to the Race I was born?
To me that’s no reason why I
Should cling to a faith that I scorn,
When my birthright’s the infinite sky!
Victor
Neuburg - The Agnostic Journal 1904